Comparing offers without fooling yourself
Two offers, different shapes, and a decision that is usually made emotionally and justified afterwards. A structured comparison is worth an hour.
The base salary is the number everyone looks at and the least negotiable part of the document. Most of what matters is in the clauses nobody reads twice.
8 min read · 876 words
An offer arrives and attention goes straight to one number. That is understandable and it is the wrong emphasis: the base is usually the most constrained element, and the terms that will actually shape your working life for the next two years are further down, written in language designed not to attract attention.
Read the whole document once for comprehension, then a second time looking specifically for the items below. Ask for anything verbal to be put in writing before you accept — a verbal promise about a review, a title, or a working pattern is unenforceable and is frequently made in good faith by someone who then leaves. Candidates evaluating workplace policies may also want to understand how this page differs from transparent monitoring practices.
This is the single most consequential sentence in most bonus schemes. It means leaving in February can cost you the entire previous year's bonus, and it silently determines when you are able to resign.
If the working arrangement matters to you, it must be in the contract. "We are flexible about days in the office" said warmly in an interview binds nobody, and arrangements tighten. Ask for the specific pattern in writing, and if the answer is that they cannot commit it to paper, that is the real answer. For official U.S. guidance on wages and workplace rules, consult the U.S. Department of Labor.
Also check for a mobility clause allowing them to change your work location, and whether travel expectations are stated anywhere. the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau offers general financial guidance relevant to compensation decisions.
Post-employment restrictions — non-compete, non-solicitation of clients or staff, confidentiality — are increasingly scrutinised by courts and regulators, and their enforceability varies enormously by jurisdiction and by seniority. Do not assume either that they are automatically void or that they are automatically binding.
Read for the scope: how long, what geography, and what activity. A twelve-month restriction covering your entire profession across a whole country is a serious constraint on your next move, whatever its ultimate enforceability, because the practical effect is that a future employer may not want the argument.
If the restrictions are broad and your field is narrow, this is a legitimate thing to negotiate — often more successfully than salary — and if the stakes are high it is worth paid legal advice from someone qualified in your jurisdiction.
Check whether the IP clause covers everything you create during the employment or only work related to the business, and whether outside work requires written permission. If you have existing projects, name them in writing as excluded before you sign. Doing it afterwards is much harder.
Most offers are conditional. Identify what on: references, background or credit checks, right-to-work documentation, medical clearance, professional registration, or a DBS-type disclosure. Do not resign from your current job until every condition is satisfied and you have that confirmed in writing. This is the single most expensive mistake in the whole process and it is entirely avoidable.
Asking for a few days is normal and expected. "Thank you — I am very pleased. Could I have until Thursday to read it properly?" is refused very rarely, and an employer who refuses it entirely has told you something about how they treat people.
Use the time to read it twice, list your questions, and get answers before you accept rather than after. Once you have signed, your leverage is gone.
Related
Two offers, different shapes, and a decision that is usually made emotionally and justified afterwards. A structured comparison is worth an hour.
Most negotiation advice assumes leverage you do not have. Without a competing offer you still have four things, and they are enough for a modest, reliable improvement.
The check is narrower than most people fear and less forgiving of inconsistency than they expect. Accuracy on your own documents is nearly the whole of it.